EVS-Lab quadrant study Essay Example

EVS-Lab quadrant study Essay The main findings of this study of vegetation in Terrace and Forest are that this sensitive environment is intricately balanced by the maintenance of its vegetation. Based on the readings above we are able to identify that vegetation levels in Area 1 i. e. Terrace is much higher than Area 2 i. e. Forest. One of the sole reasons to this can be, Sunlight-Since plant can absorb more sunlight in Area 1 since not many Trees are blocking sunlight for plants and grass unlike in Area 2 where plant growth is very limited due to blockage of sunlight. This factor will affect plant growth thereby Vegetation. Continuous harvesting of plants and grass in area 1 has lead to higher vegetation levels present there unlike Area 2 where Major parts of quadrant were covered with dry soil, twigs and leaves were an evident factor to conclude lack of harvesting in Area 2. Presence of many plants in Area 1 is another indication of a typical health land vegetation. Major Component covered with Dry soil served as a factor to low nutrient in soil in Area 2 rather than in Area 1, where minor dry land was discovered. Therefore findings conclusion of this vegetation study is that relationship between the vegetation of the two areas (Forest Terrace) is influenced by external factors such as soil harvest and environmental factors such as sunlight. Therefore Area 1(terrace) has a much healthier Vegetation compared to Area 2(forest). Evaluation: From our research and findings on this experiment we have discovered that Area 1(Terrace) has a much healthier vegetation compared to Area 2(forests). We will write a custom essay sample on EVS-Lab quadrant study specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on EVS-Lab quadrant study specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on EVS-Lab quadrant study specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer However based on the data collection processing,Pattern or relation with Vegetation level with both the areas are very limited. However during the experiment there were many limitations:   The field work investigative tests were carried out by small groups of students. This could have distorted the findings as techniques may have varied been inconsistent. Each group was made aware of what how the data needed to be obtained to keep it as consistent as possible. Time limits on the data collection may also have meant that there was less accuracy in the other recorded results. Although trouble was taken to correctly label samples record data, the sample station data from 25 metres became contaminated by human error. This meant that no comparison could be drawn from these stations. This could have been avoided if there had been a less pressurised time limit to the field work tests. * Experiment being carried out once ,may have lead to less accurate results for the vegetation study. Transect study being carried out on one area rather on two different areas may have distorted results.   Testing vegetation levels only by the means of transects quadrants, means testing methods were very limited Therefore these steps can be carried out to to improve the experiment and obtain results more specific and accurate: Larger groups of students may be utilized to keep results as consistent as possible and improve results.   Time can be increased for data collection to collect sufficient data to improve accuracy. It would also be interesting to see, if experiment could be performed repeatedly at different times of the year and observe if any changes in vegetation levels occur and make comparisons. Rather than the transect study being more fixed to one area, it can be studied for two areas rather than two sites at one area. By implementing this method comparisons can be made and result for vegetation level may improve.   Besides employing transect quadrants to study vegetation level, Tests on soil such as pH, moisture content may be conducted to make comparisons with vegetation and soil of the areas.

Fostering Interpersonal Relationships in Diverse Groups

Fostering Interpersonal Relationships in Diverse Groups Proper interpersonal relationship is an important provision within international corporations. Additionally, the aspects of diversity must be considered within organizations in order to enhance competitiveness, distinctiveness, prosperity, and uphold meaningful competitive advantages.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Fostering Interpersonal Relationships in Diverse Groups specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More A marketing campaign (organized by a global U.S. Corporation) meant to recruit team members in Greece, Singapore, Germany, and Iran must consider the provisions of varying cultures, diversity, interpersonal relations, and other relevant provisions in the recruitment drive. Since the organization endeavors to attain an international outlook, dominance, and presence, it is crucial to consider such provisions during the development of a viable recruitment drive (House, Gupta, Dorfman Javidan, 2004). This move will consi der and nurture the aspects of Cultural differences, gender provisions, power distance, future performances, individualistic vs. collectivist patterns, uncertainty avoidance, and assertiveness among other considerable virtues. There are numerous ways through which an organization can foster interpersonal relationships among the diverse groups of people from the four concerned cultures namely Greece, Singapore, Germany, and Iran. Evidently, each country has varying cultures in the realms of their lifestyles, operations, and workplace provisions. In order to foster interpersonal relationships, the aspects of tolerance, understanding, support, flexibility, and cultural dynamism are important. They allow one to relate perfectly with others despite the cultural and individual differences (Firestone Catlett, 2009). It is crucial to consider such provisions in the diverse contexts due to their viability and appropriateness. By promoting tolerance among the concerned individuals, it is pos sible to enhance the interpersonal relationships in a diverse workforce. Encouraging teamwork, providing individuals with considerable and equal opportunities within the workforce, as well as nurturing each person’s distinctiveness can help in fostering interpersonal relationships considerably. It is also important to appreciate gender differences, enhance equality, enhance future performances, and reduce the provisions of power distance within international corporations. The understanding of honor and diversity across the four cultures of Greece, Singapore, Germany, and Iran can be improved through numerous ways. It is important to enlighten the concerned stakeholders on the importance of diversity and how it can be nurtured to benefit the concerned organizations.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Additionally, cultural differences can be used to improve the competitiveness, international presence, viability, and competitive advantages of the concerned company despite the challenges. This is a critical provision in diverse contexts as indicated earlier. Another practice meant to develop/improve the understanding of honor and diversity within the concerned organization is the development of equity and justness within the workforce (House, Gupta, Dorfman Javidan, 2004). Since the four countries differ considerably in the aspects of culture, it is crucial to consider viable provisions regarding this issue. Some cultures have established and embraced the provisions of individualism while others have embraced collectivism. Operating contextually in every country might enhance the prosperity of the organization. Additionally, minimizing power distance and avoiding uncertainties can actually help in the situation. It is crucial to understand how to be a servant leader to employees from each of the four countries namely Greece, Singapore, Germ any, and Iran. Since each country possesses distinctive workplace cultures, a servant leader in each country must understand the environment of operation, embrace interpersonal relationships, lead by examples, establish/embrace teamwork, and consider other viable provisions that will uphold the productivity of the workforce (Grà ¶schl, 2011). This occurs while regarding diverse stipulations in each country. Additionally, a servant leader must prospect the intended future performances of the organization in respective countries. This will help in organizing business prospects within the corporation. Concurrently, it is important to be assertive in some circumstances. References Firestone, R. Catlett, J. (2009). The ethics of interpersonal relationships. London: Karnac. Grà ¶schl, S. (2011). Diversity in the Workplace: Multi-disciplinary and International Perspectives. Farnham: Gower. House, R., Gupta, V., Dorfman, P. Javidan, M. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Fostering Interpersonal Relationships in Diverse Groups specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More